Well that answers a lot, I'm still only considering the 722 so that will be
good enough without the MP-2.....
Dan, I haven't forgotten that you are the dealer here, I am still buying th=
e
wife flowers and taking her out to dinner, I have to drop it on her soon :)
Martyn
Martyn Stewart
Bird and Animal Sounds Digitally Recorded at:
http://www.naturesound.org
N47.65543 W121.98428
Redmond. Washington. USA
Make every Garden a wildlife Habitat!
425-898-0462
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Danielson
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 2:36 PM
To:
Subject: RE: [Nature Recordists] Sound Devices 744T
At 8:01 AM -0800 1/30/05, Martyn Stewart wrote:
>Rob
>
>Thanks for that.....
>How confident would you be if you left the MP-2 at home and just used the
>744 to do it all, do you feel the MP-2 enhances the 744 or is it just that
>you are use to taking the MP-2 with you all the time?
>I would want to know that all I needed in the field would be the 744 or 72=
2
>and my mics.
>
>Thanks mate
>
>Martyn
Sorry, I forgot to recap that the 744T-- though a 4 track recorder--
only has two mic inputs. Another mic pre is necessary for 4 mics,
total. The quality difference between the MP-2 and the 744's
built-in two channel mic pre is more dramatic than I guessed it would
be. I'd consider having 4 channels of 744T quality if SD ever comes
out with a stand-alone 2 channel mic pre based on the new technology.
Rob D.
--
"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg
Yahoo! Groups Links
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|