Nice diagram - thanks Rob.
John Hartog
--- In Rob Danielson
<> wrote:
> Here's a wiring diagram:
>
http://www.uwm.edu/~type/Mic%20Preamps/shure183p-i-pAdapt
ercable.jpg
> Rob D.
>
>
> = = = =
>
> John Hartog wrote:
> >Dan Dugan might be the expert on this, but referring to past
> >discussions between Dan and Rob -
> >
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/message/1461
7
> >
> >- and assuming the 93s are wired similarly to the 183s, hot
> >connects to pin two (the bottom pin with the red wire), and
shield
> >connects to pins 1,3 and 4 together.
> >I hope to try it myself as soon as get all the parts.
> >-John Hartog
> >
> >
> >--- In "Gus"
<>
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> Can anyone help me with the wiring diagram from the
WL93 4
> >pin plug to
> >> a 3.5MM stereo miniplug? I have teh mating connectors.
> >>
> >> Thanks Gus--- In
> >Jeremiah Moore
> >> <> wrote:
> >> > Waiting, with interest, to hear the results.
> >> >
> >> > I'm interested in a head-to-head with the Shure's and the
> >(more
> >> > expensive!) DPA 4061s. Greg Weddig and I talked about
this
> >> > yesterday... I think it could be arranged.
> >> >
> >> > -jeremiah
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > >Yeah, I noticed that...although it is pretty flat to below
> >> > >100Hz...doubt if there is much in the way of sounds I
want
> >that is
> >> > >down there...in any case, I like the slightly higher
> >output(even after
> >> > >you calculate for the higher output impedance) and the
> >better noise
> >> > >floor...I have ordered a pair and will report back when
they
> >come
> >> in....
> >> > >
> >> > >thanks
> >> > >
> >> > >gus--- In "John
> >Hartog"
> >> > ><> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> If you didn't already notice, I posted a pfd from Shure
with
> >> > >> information on both the WL183 and WL93.
> >> > >>
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/files/wl183_wl
1
> >> > >> 84_wl185.pdf
> >> > >>
> >> > >> It appears that the 93 has a higher frequency range,
up to
> >20kHz,
> >> > >> where the 183's limit is 17kHz. However, the 183
> >remains flat to
> >> > >> below 100Hz while the 93 begins rolling off around
> >350Hz.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> John Hartog
> >> > >>
> >> > >> --- In Dan
Dugan
> >> > >> <> wrote:
> >> > >> > Gus wrote:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >Hello, am new to the group. Thank you for being
here.
> >I have
> >> > >> been
> >> > >> > >researching microphones to work with my Sharp
> >MD-DR7 for
> >> > >> nature sound
> >> > >> > >recording. I have seen a number of messages
> >suggesting
> >> > >> the Shure
> >> > >> > >WL183's to be very good, inexpensive mics-as low
as
> >$71
> >> > >> each.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >Looking through the Shure specs, I find the WL93
is
> >less
> >> > >> expensive,
> >> > >> > >has greater frequency response, lower noise level,
> >and
> >> > >> higher output.
> >> > >> > > What am I missing here?
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Thanks for the tip, I'm going to take a look at it.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > -Dan Dugan
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >"Microphones are not ears,
> >> > >Loudspeakers are not birds,
> >> > >A listening room is not nature."
> >> > >Klas Strandberg
> >> > >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > jeremiah lyman moore | san francisco | sound+media |
> >
> >> > http://babyjane.com/timeweb/
> >> > http://northstation.net/ organic, mechanized, organized
sound
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >"Microphones are not ears,
> >Loudspeakers are not birds,
> >A listening room is not nature."
> >Klas Strandberg
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|