Here's a wiring diagram:
http://www.uwm.edu/~type/Mic%20Preamps/shure183p-i-pAdaptercable.jpg
Rob D.
= = = =
John Hartog wrote:
>Dan Dugan might be the expert on this, but referring to past
>discussions between Dan and Rob -
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/message/14617
>
>- and assuming the 93s are wired similarly to the 183s, hot
>connects to pin two (the bottom pin with the red wire), and shield
>connects to pins 1,3 and 4 together.
>I hope to try it myself as soon as get all the parts.
>-John Hartog
>
>
>--- In "Gus" <>
>wrote:
>>
>> Can anyone help me with the wiring diagram from the WL93 4
>pin plug to
>> a 3.5MM stereo miniplug? I have teh mating connectors.
>>
>> Thanks Gus--- In
>Jeremiah Moore
>> <> wrote:
>> > Waiting, with interest, to hear the results.
>> >
>> > I'm interested in a head-to-head with the Shure's and the
>(more
>> > expensive!) DPA 4061s. Greg Weddig and I talked about this
>> > yesterday... I think it could be arranged.
>> >
>> > -jeremiah
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > >Yeah, I noticed that...although it is pretty flat to below
>> > >100Hz...doubt if there is much in the way of sounds I want
>that is
>> > >down there...in any case, I like the slightly higher
>output(even after
>> > >you calculate for the higher output impedance) and the
>better noise
>> > >floor...I have ordered a pair and will report back when they
>come
>> in....
>> > >
>> > >thanks
>> > >
>> > >gus--- In "John
>Hartog"
>> > ><> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> If you didn't already notice, I posted a pfd from Shure with
>> > >> information on both the WL183 and WL93.
>> > >>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/files/wl183_wl1
>> > >> 84_wl185.pdf
>> > >>
>> > >> It appears that the 93 has a higher frequency range, up to
>20kHz,
>> > >> where the 183's limit is 17kHz. However, the 183
>remains flat to
>> > >> below 100Hz while the 93 begins rolling off around
>350Hz.
>> > >>
>> > >> John Hartog
>> > >>
>> > >> --- In Dan Dugan
>> > >> <> wrote:
>> > >> > Gus wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > >Hello, am new to the group. Thank you for being here.
>I have
>> > >> been
>> > >> > >researching microphones to work with my Sharp
>MD-DR7 for
>> > >> nature sound
>> > >> > >recording. I have seen a number of messages
>suggesting
>> > >> the Shure
>> > >> > >WL183's to be very good, inexpensive mics-as low as
>$71
>> > >> each.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >Looking through the Shure specs, I find the WL93 is
>less
>> > >> expensive,
>> > >> > >has greater frequency response, lower noise level,
>and
>> > >> higher output.
>> > >> > > What am I missing here?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Thanks for the tip, I'm going to take a look at it.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > -Dan Dugan
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >"Microphones are not ears,
>> > >Loudspeakers are not birds,
>> > >A listening room is not nature."
>> > >Klas Strandberg
>> > >Yahoo! Groups Links
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > jeremiah lyman moore | san francisco | sound+media |
>
>> > http://babyjane.com/timeweb/
>> > http://northstation.net/ organic, mechanized, organized sound
>
>
>
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
