Dan Dugan might be the expert on this, but referring to past
discussions between Dan and Rob -
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/message/14617
- and assuming the 93s are wired similarly to the 183s, hot
connects to pin two (the bottom pin with the red wire), and shield
connects to pins 1,3 and 4 together.
I hope to try it myself as soon as get all the parts.
-John Hartog
--- In "Gus" <>
wrote:
>
> Can anyone help me with the wiring diagram from the WL93 4
pin plug to
> a 3.5MM stereo miniplug? I have teh mating connectors.
>
> Thanks Gus--- In
Jeremiah Moore
> <> wrote:
> > Waiting, with interest, to hear the results.
> >
> > I'm interested in a head-to-head with the Shure's and the
(more
> > expensive!) DPA 4061s. Greg Weddig and I talked about this
> > yesterday... I think it could be arranged.
> >
> > -jeremiah
> >
> >
> >
> > >Yeah, I noticed that...although it is pretty flat to below
> > >100Hz...doubt if there is much in the way of sounds I want
that is
> > >down there...in any case, I like the slightly higher
output(even after
> > >you calculate for the higher output impedance) and the
better noise
> > >floor...I have ordered a pair and will report back when they
come
> in....
> > >
> > >thanks
> > >
> > >gus--- In "John
Hartog"
> > ><> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> If you didn't already notice, I posted a pfd from Shure with
> > >> information on both the WL183 and WL93.
> > >>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/files/wl183_wl1
> > >> 84_wl185.pdf
> > >>
> > >> It appears that the 93 has a higher frequency range, up to
20kHz,
> > >> where the 183's limit is 17kHz. However, the 183
remains flat to
> > >> below 100Hz while the 93 begins rolling off around
350Hz.
> > >>
> > >> John Hartog
> > >>
> > >> --- In Dan Dugan
> > >> <> wrote:
> > >> > Gus wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > >Hello, am new to the group. Thank you for being here.
I have
> > >> been
> > >> > >researching microphones to work with my Sharp
MD-DR7 for
> > >> nature sound
> > >> > >recording. I have seen a number of messages
suggesting
> > >> the Shure
> > >> > >WL183's to be very good, inexpensive mics-as low as
$71
> > >> each.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >Looking through the Shure specs, I find the WL93 is
less
> > >> expensive,
> > >> > >has greater frequency response, lower noise level,
and
> > >> higher output.
> > >> > > What am I missing here?
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks for the tip, I'm going to take a look at it.
> > >> >
> > >> > -Dan Dugan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >"Microphones are not ears,
> > >Loudspeakers are not birds,
> > >A listening room is not nature."
> > >Klas Strandberg
> > >Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > jeremiah lyman moore | san francisco | sound+media |
> > http://babyjane.com/timeweb/
> > http://northstation.net/ organic, mechanized, organized sound
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|