naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MHK 800 prelim field test discussion

Subject: Re: MHK 800 prelim field test discussion
From: Aaron Ximm <>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:14:04 -0800 (PST)
Heya Bernie, Rudy,

Could you offer a short comment on your feelings on these findings? I
don't mind saying that while I presume as flat noise floor as possible
would be desirable, I'm ignorant as to whether your data suggests a
significant problem -- or how it would relate to the sensitivity across
the same range (which I recall gets pretty non-flat above 30K or so!).

E.g., I've no idea what one would expect from a mic only spec'd to 20K or
so (like the MKH20) by comparison.

Also, would you mind a very brief comment on how the noise floor *level*
compares to the other options you mention? I'd be curious too to know how
the Schoeps hi-frequency body fares by comparison... :)

Oh! And if you took it out to record those bats, how did it sound? Did you
use them in M/S? :)

 someone who's daydreamed about a pair,
  despite never hearing/using them!

    aaron

  
  http://www.quietamerican.org


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU