naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: MHK 800 prelim field test discussion

Subject: RE: MHK 800 prelim field test discussion
From: "Martyn Stewart" <>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 13:55:08 -0800
Excellent work.....

Martyn

Martyn Stewart
Bird and Animal Sounds Digitally Recorded at:
http://www.naturesound.org
N47.65543   W121.98428
Redmond. Washington. USA
Make every Garden a wildlife Habitat!

425-898-0462


-----Original Message-----
From: Wild Sanctuary  
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 1:47 PM
To: 
Subject: [Nature Recordists] MHK 800 prelim field test discussion


On the eve of 5 November, Rudy Trubitt, Bill Rainey, me and my wife, 
Kat, ventured out to a bat observation site just north of Bolinas, 
California (north of San Francisco along the coast about 1 hour's 
drive) to test the Sennheiser MKH 800 (reputed to be acceptable for 
signal to 50kHz). First, aside from the field test, Rudy did a test 
in his facility and then we sent the report to the company for 
feedback. Here's what we found:

Rudy's comments;

OK, I have a few hard numbers:

Test methodology:

An MKH-800 was connected to a Grace V3 mic-pre A/D with a gain of 55 
dB. After a slate was made, the mic was placed into a foam-lined box 
in a relatively quiet room to minimize the contribution from noise in 
the surrounding acoustical environment. The left channel of Grace 
preamp was terminated in a 200 ohm dummy load. V3's dither noise 
turned OFF.

Sampling rate = 96 kHz, 24 bit data was recorded into Fostex FR-2. 24 
bit 96 kHz stereo files were recorded an analyzed in Adobe audition's 
Frequency Analysis window.
MKH 800 noise-floor appears to rise 10 dB per octave starting at about 10
kHz.

7 kHz   -112
10 kHz  -110
20 kHz  -100
30 kHz  -93
40 kHz  -90

On the terminated channel, there is a very very mild rise in the 
noise floor, but perhaps only about 1dB over three octaves.

In contrast, an MKH 20 had the same rising noise profile up to about 
20 kHz, after which it began rolling off. A Schopes CM6 with MK4 card 
capsule  had a roughly flat noise floor from 10kHz up. Same flat 
noise curve from a Neuman KM120 (figure-8)

Note that none of these tests actually measured the mic's frequency 
response at ultrasonic frequencies. But the rising noise floor of the 
MKH-800 matches my subjective analysis of our Bat recordings.

You mentioned putting some preliminary results on the 
naturerecordists list? How about you do a write up and let me give it 
a once over before posting.

It would be nice to get some feedback/confirmation from Sennheiser on 
this before spreading it around. I'm pretty confident about the 
results, but always nice to do a little fact-checking before 
publication.

Rudy

****************************

Sennheiser's response;

Hello all,

I did relay the subject to Manfred Hibbing, the brain and designer at 
our home office, who is THE MAN behind the current versions of all 
Sennheiser RF-condenser microphones, and I am happy to share his 
input to the reported observations:

The Grace pre-amp is ok and out of discussion. The MKH800 indeed 
shows an increasing noise floor at high frequencies like all MKH 
microphones due to a special design principle. The MKH capsules are 
optimized for high electro-acoustical efficiency at frequencies where 
the human ear is most sensitive to noise. Thus the audible (weighted) 
noise performance is improved. However, this design is related with a 
high-frequency roll-off of the capsules which is compensated for by 
electrical equalization in the microphone circuit. This increases the 
noise floor at very high frequencies where our ears are rather 
insensitive as can be seen from the steep cut-off slope of the CCIR 
weighting curve. While the frequency response of the MKH20 to MKH80 
is limited to 20 kHz, the equalization of the MKH800 is continued, 
and the noise above 20 kHz is increased as well. The resulting S/N is 
still superior to microphones without electrical equalization 
technique. For instance, a 1/4" measuring microphone with a 
comparable bandwidth will contribute considerably more noise as the 
S/N decreases with decreasing diaphragm diameter.

Uwe Sattler, Sennheiser USA


All the best, folks,
Bernie Krause

Wild Sanctuary, Inc.
P. O. Box 536
Glen Ellen, California  95442-0536
Tel: (707) 996-6677
Fax: (707) 996-0280
http://www.wildsanctuary.com



-- 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 






________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU