> This is that same scene as the 16x speedup, right?
Nope different.
I should have pulled a different sound to test this idea, was a bad
choice for a bunch of reasons. Biggest is I should have used a flat
land area for this test.
I will try again, much more controlled, with matched mics, in a flat
space with intersecting highways in the distance.
I like "decorrelated" sound but I will agree not this way.
Rich
>
> I listend a few times through Tannoy passive Reveals off of
> Mac sound-out, then switched to headphones through iMic --
> 1st Senn HD 280pro (closed), then HD 600s (open). I prefer
> the straight binaural with all three listening modes, and
> I prefer the HD 600s for "being there".
>
> Let me suggest a few conjectures for why I don't like the
> wide baseline bass:
>
> It's decorrelated from the corresponding HF parts because
> of the separation from the close-spaced pair. That means
> you can hear the low end in each ear seperately from the
> other ear and the high parts.
>
> mp3 compression aritfacts.
>
> Rich, can you estimate the path of the jet with respect to
> the acoustic baseline? I take it that it did not pass directly
> overhead, nor was it parallel to the line of the mics. I assume
> the widespread mics were on the same axis as the binaural pair.
>
> Also, was the binaural pair and the wide pair the same model mics?
>
> Thanks for doing the recording, processing and sharing -- I'm
> blowing all my recording time on mundane things like music.
> I like that skeeter or whatever off to the right just at the end.
>
> -- Mike
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|