naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

bass rolloff question

Subject: bass rolloff question
From: "jessehammons" <>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 00:09:13 -0000
I have found the following justification for the having a bass rolloff
filter in a microphone power supply or preamp:

"The bass rolloff benefit (in this situation) would be to reduct
trafic motor rumble that is often heard inside city located buildings.
 Just recording a solo violin would be a situatiion where bass
reduction should have very minor (if any) effect on the overal
instrumental warmth of the recording.  Where motor rumble is very
noticable inside, using the 65 cycle position would improve the
recording of just  violin by reducing interfering noises."

                    Leonard Lombardo of Sonic Studios
                    cf. http://www.sonicstudios.com/page17.html

My question: what are the disadvantages of filtering out unwanted bass
frequencies in post-production? (err, post field recording) I would
prefer to do this in post, because if I filter them out, I won't be
able to play them on my friend's Udder Thump 2000:
http://ontology.com/canton/projects/udderthump2000/index.html

Now wouldn't that be a shame?

Seriously, do low frequency sounds somehow introduce noise or other
problems into the recording chain?

Thanks,
-Jesse



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU