Subject: | Re: the lowest natural sound yet detected |
---|---|
From: | Aaron Ximm <> |
Date: | Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:36:28 -0700 (PDT) |
> If the sound is able to propagate through space, it would be a very thin There was a contentious debate about this story on the phonography list; the upshot is that this is definitely a sound as physics defines it (propagation of pressure waves through a physical medium, in this case gas -- NOT vacuum)... ...but some members of the list took issue with whether ultra- and infra- sound not "hearable" is "really" sound. (Personally, I have no problem saying that infra- or ultra- sound with frequencies orders of magnitute below or beyond the range of *human* hearing is still "really" sound...) best, aaron http://www.quietamerican.org ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: the lowest natural sound yet detected, Eric V. Schmidt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Crown Price increase on SASS Parts, Walter Knapp |
Previous by Thread: | Re: the lowest natural sound yet detected, Eric V. Schmidt |
Next by Thread: | RE: the lowest natural sound yet detected, Scott Shepard |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU