| Subject: | Re: the lowest natural sound yet detected |
|---|---|
| From: | "Eric V. Schmidt" <> |
| Date: | Fri, 19 Sep 2003 09:42:48 -0400 |
Hello again; "The ripples are separated by about 35,000 light-years-which produces a B-flat 57 octaves below middle C." Does this mean that the wavelength or frequency is 1 per 35,000 light years? That would be a wave length os 1.23 x 10 to the 19th power. Is that right? That is one low sound Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: the lowest natural sound yet detected, Eric V. Schmidt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: the lowest natural sound yet detected, Walter Knapp |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: the lowest natural sound yet detected, Eric V. Schmidt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: the lowest natural sound yet detected, Walter Knapp |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU