Re: the lowest natural sound yet detected

[michael fish <>]

actually, aaron [at the risk of sounding extremely pedantic], i believe tha=
t altercation took place on the lowercase sound list. the phonography list =
is much too polite for that type of argeybargey, i would have thought.

just thought i'd stick up for those nice gentle, unassuming phonographers :=
o)

best,
michael

Aaron Ximm <> wrote:

> If the sound is able to propagate through space, it would be a very thin

There was a contentious debate about this story on the phonography list;

...but some members of the list took issue with whether ultra- and infra-
sound not "hearable" is "really" sound.



---------------------------------
Want to chat instantly with your online friends?=A0Get the FREE Yahoo!Messe=
nger

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________