| Subject: | Re: Digital Distortion |
|---|---|
| From: | Walter Knapp <> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Jun 2003 23:49:34 -0400 |
Clifford Caruthers wrote: > To my way of thinking there's no 'damage'. If you're recording is > already very low level, then normalizing will bring out low bit-rate > artifacts that are best left out of earshot There are, of course, filters that are specifically designed to cut off all sound below a certain level, to filter in the domain of dynamic range. They are tricky to use, but I've had some success simply filtering off the low level stuff. The tricky part is removing what's unwanted and keeping what's wanted. Walt ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Digital Distortion, Walter Knapp |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Digital Distortion, Walter Knapp |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Digital Distortion, Walter Knapp |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Digital Distortion, Walter Knapp |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU