naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: storing and preserving...

Subject: Re: storing and preserving...
From: "oryoki2000" <>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 23:49:28 -0000
You're sure this is acoustic data, and not magnetometer readings 
looking for sunken galleons or Russian nuclear subs?

For recording your data onboard the ship, I'd suggest writing the 
data directly to DVD-R discs.  A single DVD-R can hold 4.7GB of data, 
or more than three hours of data at your current rate.  24bit 96kHz 
in stereo is 600 kBytes/sec, and DVD-R write speed has been measured 
at up to 2.77 MBytes/sec, so the drive should have no difficulty 
keeping up with the data stream.  For increased reliability, you 
could configure your equipment to use RAID 1 disc mirroring to two 
DVD-R recorders simultaneously.    

Pioneer makes the standard DVD-R drive.  Their new DVR-A04 costs less 
than $300.  

The blank DVD-R media vary in price due to marketing.  Generic discs 
cost less than $100 for 100 discs.  A disc with a better reputation 
is the TDK 2X DVD-R, which costs about $275 for 100, including jewel 
cases.  The very highly regarded Verbatim DVD-R disc costs $450 for 
100, with cases.  I'd experiment with the generics, but probably 
spend the money for a brand name for original recordings.

DVD-R discs have an estimated storage life of 100 years, far more 
than storage on magnetic media like tape or hard disc.  The discs do 
fail, however, so the standard routine of having off-site backups 
still applies.

In the confusing world of DVD standards, several companies make 
recorders that use the DVD+R standard.  They have a higher write to 
disc speed, but DVD-R is plenty fast enough for your recording.  
DVD+R discs also cost more than twice as much.  So I'd recommend 
sticking with DVD-R for now.

For online storage, the Intel/Microsoft specification for ATAPI drive 
storage is limited to 28 bit addressing = 137GB limit to drive space, 
even in a RAID configuration.   The largest ATAPI drive sold today, 
Western Digital's $400 200GB unit, requires a special hard disc 
controller to get around this limitation.

On the other hand, SCSI uses 32 bit addressing = 2.2 terabytes of 
storage.  So SCSI RAID is the right choice for a big dataset.  32bit 
pc motherboards don't benefit from SCSI RAID speed as much as a 64bit 
Sun system does, but the extra storage space makes SCSI the right 
choice.  SCSI drives are more expensive because they are built to 
higher standards and offer faster performance.  They still offer good 
value due to their typically longer warranty and longer MTBF rating.

Fibre Channel and SAN offer higher speeds and larger capacities 
still, but then you'd be building your own data center.



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: storing and preserving..., oryoki2000 <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU