naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: Noise Pollution

Subject: Re: Re: Noise Pollution
From: Lang Elliott <>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:20:34 -0500
While stereo may sound better when played-back properly on a stereo system,
I doubt that a stereo signal allows for that much more "mental processing"
than monaural, simply because most of the noise pollution will be in both
channels anyway.

Lang

> Walter wrote (in part):
> 
>> From: Walter Knapp <>
> 
>> 
>> I consider the stereo parabolic to be the biggest advantage when I moved
>> from my previous mono parabolic. You then allow people to use the very
>> best filter of all, their own internal sound processing. Far more
>> capable than any filter we might apply.
> 
> What a very important point!  I had forgotten, but am now reminded, of how
> amazed I was, when first I started recording (in '68) at all the noise there
> is which I just hadn't noticed.  If stereo recording can let the listener
> apply their own mental filtering, that surely is a tremendous step forward.
> 
> I've never advanced past mono.  Maybe I should!
> 
> Syd Curtis in Australia
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
> 
> 



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU