Subject: | Re: Re: homemade hydrophone |
---|---|
From: | "Mark Griswold" <> |
Date: | Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:51:31 -0800 |
> > Do you think the AFAB will produce better sound than a Sennheiser MKH > 20/condom combo? I imagine that using a condom will drastically change the > frequency response, causing significant rolloff at higher frequencies. Is > this true? > The AFAB has an 1/8" mini trs headphone jack that puts out a bone crushing level. I couldn't hazard a quess as to the MKH20/condom sound quality - but condoms are cheap. Give a try in the bathtub. I found the condom results pretty poor, myself. But that was using a dynamic mic. Maybe if I had used a ribbed condom for greater sensitivity ... ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Re: homemade hydrophone, Lang Elliott |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Re: homemade hydrophone, Lang Elliott |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: homemade hydrophone, Lang Elliott |
Next by Thread: | Re: Re: homemade hydrophone, Lang Elliott |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU