canberrabirds

Birding philosophy

To: Canberrabirds list <>
Subject: Birding philosophy
From: "David McDonald (Personal)" <>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 10:05:29 +0000

Thanks Ben. Perhaps part of the challenge here is to differentiate between ethics and morals. Ethics is concerned with what I aught to do in a given situation. Morals are concerned with the rules about right and wrong that I feel obliged to follow—rules that come from outside of myself. The moral stances of various religions come to mind. Ethics is about using our intellect to decide what we should or should not do in a given situation, rather than simply following a set of rules that have been imposed upon us, or that we have accepted voluntarily.

 

I have long had concerns about my professional associations’ so-called Codes of Ethics. Mostly they seek to impose a set of rules about what we should do or not do. They seek to codify a set of morals. They don’t give us guidance as to how to make our own decisions about what is ethical.

 

So, with your question, were we to pose it as an ethical one, we would ask what should I do when I see, for example, a currawong attacking a fairy-wren nest? The challenge here is that there is no clear guidance on how to answer the question, as different people will answer it differently. And that is as it should be.

 

That said, the guidance from the brilliant Sydney-based Ethics Centre is, I suggest, helpful. Anyway, I have found it to be so.

To quote from https://ethics.org.au/knowledge/what-is-ethics/

… there are a few questions you can ask that can help crystalise the ethical issues for you.

  1. Would I be happy for this decision to be headlining the news tomorrow?
  2. Is there an ethical non-negotiable at play?
  3. Will my action make the world a better place?
  4. What would happen if everybody did this?
  5. What will this do to my character or the character of my organisation?
  6. Is this consistent with my values and principles?

 

Perhaps this helps?

 

Best wishes - David

 

From: Canberrabirds <> On Behalf Of ben milbourne via Canberrabirds
Sent: Friday, January 5, 2024 6:10 PM
To:
Subject: [Canberrabirds] Birding philosophy

 

Hmmmm

 

I pose the following query:  if its unethical to disturb birds when seeking to (example) observe them or grab a photo, is it also unethical to rescue them, as this too could be argued as interrupting (eg its life cycle, a food source for other species, etc).

 

Yes, there will be many meaningful reasons to help.  And many will simply state that it depends on the situation.  But if so, are we applying this across the board or only if it aligns with our own preferences and understanding. 

 

So,  ask ... where do we draw the line of what is ethical birding and unethical disruption? On what grounds is the line to be defined?  How might we approach resolving it?  And for whose benefit are we motivated?

 

As I said, this is a philosophical query.   But nonetheless one which, when posed,  may offer insight into our own awareness and decision-making.   Both as individual birders and as a community.

 

Hope to bump into you out in the great outdoors 

 

Cheers for now, Ben 

Attachment: ATT00001.txt
Description: ATT00001.txt

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email . If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU