canberrabirds

Birding philosophy

To: 'ben milbourne' <>
Subject: Birding philosophy
From: Philip Veerman <>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 08:34:20 +0000

If it’s unethical to do any of these things, that is partly a word issue. These questions have been addressed before. There is no right single answer. I believe the usual idea is that we should allow nature to take its course. Sometimes we see messages that maybe are unaware that things die and suggest we should do anything to rescue a bird that may well be on the way out anyway. The typical answer is there is a general thought that if the bird or fauna needs rescue, due to some danger that has been caused by human activity, like for example being tangled in string or rubbish, and noting that a large proportion of the cases that are found are caused by human activity. Then there is an ethical case for rescue, if there is good chance that the animal can be rescued. This is different from the question of practicality. In either case of your question, the animal does not care whether it is ethical or not. The internet has huge numbers of small films of animals being rescued by people and often putting nonsense claims of the animals expressing appreciation. Sometimes they are “happy” to be freed but many of these stories are clearly contrived.

 

Philip

 

From: Canberrabirds [ On Behalf Of ben milbourne via Canberrabirds
Sent: Friday, 5 January, 2024 6:10 PM
To:
Subject: [Canberrabirds] Birding philosophy

 

Hmmmm

 

I pose the following query:  if its unethical to disturb birds when seeking to (example) observe them or grab a photo, is it also unethical to rescue them, as this too could be argued as interrupting (eg its life cycle, a food source for other species, etc).

 

Yes, there will be many meaningful reasons to help.  And many will simply state that it depends on the situation.  But if so, are we applying this across the board or only if it aligns with our own preferences and understanding. 

 

So,  ask ... where do we draw the line of what is ethical birding and unethical disruption? On what grounds is the line to be defined?  How might we approach resolving it?  And for whose benefit are we motivated?

 

As I said, this is a philosophical query.   But nonetheless one which, when posed,  may offer insight into our own awareness and decision-making.   Both as individual birders and as a community.

 

Hope to bump into you out in the great outdoors 

 

Cheers for now, Ben 

Attachment: ATT00001.txt
Description: ATT00001.txt

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email . If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU