Good discussion. I have been looking for a pocket size guide that you can
fit in your shirt pocket to save lugging the bigger version around in my
backpack. I may be naive in this as pocket size version may be simply to thick
to comfortably fit in a typical shirt pocket.
Ray
From:
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:21 AM
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: FW: [canberrabirds] Field guides
I
have a memory of someone doing a survey of the more popular guides some years
ago but have been unable to track this down on the Chatline archive or
CBN. However my memory is that as Sandra says everyone has a favourite.
The huge advantage of print is that one can go into a library or bookshop
and look at the thing before you buy. (Incidentally Canty's Books in
Fyshwick often has used or remaindered copies well below new price.)
While digital is the current flavour of the month/minute/millenium - and
you get calls as well as pix - there are traps for players of all ages. By
way of example there are two iPad versions of Morcombe - one costs $31 and the
other is free. The former has some 850 species and the latter (described
in the fine print as a sample) 50 - but this isn't immediately clear.
Similar differentials in price and content exist for on-line guides to the birds
of the UK. I'm not sure what exists for Windows or other platforms.
Martin
On 25 February 2013 09:54, sandra henderson <> wrote:
Erika - to each his own. everyone is going to have a
different
favourite guide. I've got a Slater I always take with me on
long
trips, and write in it when and where I first see a bird - I like
the
compact size. If I want to look up info on a known bird, I
prefer
Pizzey, and buy new edition each time that comes out (and pass the
old
one on to family or friends), but it's too heavy for me to want
to
carry in the field. I sometimes carry my iPod with Morcombe on it
in
the field, but a book is so much easier if you need to scan through
a
lot of pics to identify something. I don't buy overseas guides -
I
don't travel overseas, but I do have all the well-known
Australian
ones. and I do tend to buy "local" guides for various places
in
Australia - it's all a matter of money and bookshelf
space...
sandra h
> I recently acquired a new field guide
(Parrots of the World, by Forshaw) and
> I began wondering about how
others use field guides. Is it common for
> birders to annotate their
field guides (i.e. add additional common names to
> species entries),
and to note in the guide when and where they have seen a
> species? I
was also wondering how many of you "study" before taking a trip
> to a
new place, in order to memorise species that you may
encounter.
>
>
>
> I love field guides, and if I had
the money I'm sure I would be buying new
> ones all the time. I suppose
next on my list should be a current version of
> an Australian field
guide, as my current copy (given to me by my grandma) is
> as old as I
am (Simpson and Day, published in 1986)! Which reminds me, is it
>
actually worth investing in an up-to-date copy? Any recommendations
for
> which guide to get (author-wise)?
>
>
>
>
Thanks!
>
>
>
>
Erika
>
>
*******************************************************************************************************
This
is the email announcement and discussion list of the Canberra Ornithologists
Group.
Please ensure that emails posted to the list are less than 100 kB in
size.
When subscribing or unsubscribing, please insert the word 'Subscribe'
or 'Unsubscribe', as applicable, in the email's subject line.
List-Post:
<>
List-Help:
<>
List-Unsubscribe:
<>
List-Subscribe:
<>
List
archive: <http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw.edu.au/archives/html/canberrabirds>
List
manager: David McDonald, email <>
-- Martin Butterfield
|
|
