Savannah cat story

To: "peter crow" <>, "Dave Torr" <>
Subject: Savannah cat story
From: "Bill Stent" <>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:19:41 +1000
I think that would be acting immorally, but maybe not illegally.  Of
course morals are highly subjective.

My point before was that they were foolish because they invested money
before the final decision had been made.


-----Original Message-----
From: peter crow 
Sent: Monday, 4 August 2008 3:15 PM
To: Dave Torr
Cc: Bill Stent; birding australia
Subject: Savannah cat story


They did act foolishly. they made a decision without considering the
potential damage  to native wildlefe. In my opinion that's foolish.

On 04/08/2008, at 2:32 PM, Dave Torr wrote:

> But the article makes it plain that they had permission "The Parkers
> had planned to import 14 Savannah Cats in November after gaining
> written approval from the Federal Government and Australian Customs.".

> So seems they did not act foolishly and as the government has changed
> its mind (and for once in the correct way!) the Parkers have I would
> have thought some grounds for feeling hard done by!
> 2008/8/4 Bill Stent <>

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU