House Crows and ticking ethics

To: "Tony Russell" <>
Subject: House Crows and ticking ethics
From: "Evan Beaver" <>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:08:14 +1100
Not that it matters in any way to me, but there's a hole in your logic
Tony that seems to allow escapees and releases. But, as I've said
before, tick what ever you see fit, it's your list, no-one else
(should) care what's on it.

I however won't be ticking it, and hope that it's destroyed before
slinking off to find the rest of the House Crow secret society, lying
in wait for sufficient numbers to arrive and begin breeding, and
fulfil their ultimate goal of destroying all native avifauna.


On 3/27/08, Tony Russell <> wrote:
My stance is that if the bird is in Oz, no matter how it got here,
then it's tickable, and no amount of contention as to it's mode of
travel is relevant.

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU