birding-aus

ID request: Broad-billed Sandpiper/Dunlin

To: "'Mike Carter'" <>, "'Patrick Ingremeau'" <>, <>
Subject: ID request: Broad-billed Sandpiper/Dunlin
From: "Tony Russell" <>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 11:59:20 +1030
Yeah, me too Mike. There is a search facility into which I put
Broad-billed Sandpiper and no less than 54 came up! I wonder which one
patrick was referring to.??

T.

-----Original Message-----
From: 
 On Behalf Of Mike Carter
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 9:27 AM
To: Patrick Ingremeau; 
Cc: Chris Corben
Subject: ID request: Broad-billed Sandpiper/Dunlin 


This exercise shows just how hopeless I am at negotiating web-pages
which is 
why I rarely visit them! I couldn't find any shot labelled Broad-billed 
Sandpiper! I did find one of a Curlew Sandpiper correctly labelled as
such. 
A Dunlin at Cairns would be very exciting. Less than a handful of
records in 
the whole of Australia. Perhaps that was the shot originally titled 
Broad-billed Sandpiper relabelled as a result of Chris Corben's ID
advice. 
And relevant to recent discussions, it also shows why BARC is essential.
While searching for it I did find two other ID errors but I'd be
interested 
to know if others agree. I'd say the Sacred Kingfisher is a Forest and
the 
Black-naped Terns are Little Terns. In my experience the incidence of ID

errors is disturbingly high on web-sites.

Mike Carter
30 Canadian Bay Road
Mount Eliza  VIC 3930
Tel  (03) 9787 7136




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU