birding-aus
|
To: | "Patrick Ingremeau" <>, <> |
---|---|
Subject: | ID request: Broad-billed Sandpiper/Dunlin |
From: | "Mike Carter" <> |
Date: | Sat, 5 Jan 2008 09:56:33 +1100 |
This exercise shows just how hopeless I am at negotiating web-pages which is
why I rarely visit them! I couldn't find any shot labelled Broad-billed
Sandpiper! I did find one of a Curlew Sandpiper correctly labelled as such.
A Dunlin at Cairns would be very exciting. Less than a handful of records in
the whole of Australia. Perhaps that was the shot originally titled
Broad-billed Sandpiper relabelled as a result of Chris Corben's ID advice.
And relevant to recent discussions, it also shows why BARC is essential.
While searching for it I did find two other ID errors but I'd be interested
to know if others agree. I'd say the Sacred Kingfisher is a Forest and the
Black-naped Terns are Little Terns. In my experience the incidence of ID
errors is disturbingly high on web-sites.
Mike Carter 30 Canadian Bay Road Mount Eliza VIC 3930 Tel (03) 9787 7136 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Assistance with buying Borneo etc Field Guide, Andrew Taylor |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Birding Gear (not about birds themselves), Russell Woodford |
Previous by Thread: | ID request, Chris Corben |
Next by Thread: | ID request: Broad-billed Sandpiper/Dunlin, David Stowe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU