re: Re: Corellas
Bill Venables <>
Wed, 23 Aug 1995 09:47:29 +0930
>>>>> "Irene" == identon <> writes:
Irene> ...It sounds to me that, even if these birds were still
Irene> seen in Sydney/Australian east coast in 10 or 15 years
Irene> time, you would still consider them "unnatural" and
Irene> "feral" because of their lineage. I certainly agree that
Irene> sightings over a short period wouldn't warrant a formal
Irene> extension of range etc. but I was wondering about over the
Irene> longer term...
>From the Flinders Ranges right through to the Victorian border
the commonest rosella is the Adelaide rosella (or however it's
classified these days). But in Adelaide city itself and in the
parklands around the central square mile, Eastern rosellas are
far more common. This has been the case for the thirty years I
have lived here and Forshaw and Cooper have Adelaide and
surrounds marked in on their distribution map for the Eastern
rosella, from memory as an allopatric population.
The Eastern rosellas of Adelaide are presumably originally from
an escapee flock. Is this an example of the same dilemma?
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering
takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely
a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way.
If you wish to get material removed from the archive or
have other queries about the archive e-mail
Andrew Taylor at this address: