No, I think what they’ve issued is the final design.
> On 13 Apr 2016, at 8:40 AM, Peter Morgan <> wrote:
>
> I think this is a preliminary design and yet to be finalised. If so, then
> hopefully this commentary will ensure a better depiction of the Spinebill
>
> Peter Morgan
>
> The conservation battle is never finally won; the development battle is.
>
>> On 12 Apr 2016, at 6:14 PM, Peter Shute <> wrote:
>>
>> Here it is. It's supposed to be an Eastern Spinebill. Is there any species
>> like that in other countries?
>> <image1.JPG>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>> On 12 Apr 2016, at 5:48 PM, Neil Cheshire <> wrote:
>>>
>>> Interesting design for the new Australian $5 banknote - two 'native' birds
>>> are featured both of which appear to be new to science as they do not
>>> resemble any known native species!
>>>
>>> How could a design get to this stage with such obvious mistakes?
>>>
>>> The banknote can be seen at 'The Guardian' on line.
>>>
>>> Neil Cheshire
>>> <HR>
>>> <BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
>>> <BR>
>>> <BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
>>> <BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
>>> </HR>
>> <HR>
>> <BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
>> <BR>
>> <BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
>> <BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
>> </HR>
> <HR>
> <BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
> <BR>
> <BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
> <BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
> </HR>
<HR>
<BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
<BR>
<BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
<BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
</HR>
|
