My writing is pretty ordinary too ( I have the arthritis in the knuckles from
regular canings about it), but at least I can read it, mostly. I will just
stick to the system that works for me.
Carl Cliffor
> On 17 Jun 2015, at 3:57 pm, Sonja Ross <> wrote:
>
> Maybe they are based on e-Bird lists i.e what has been reported by birders
> from sightings in the area. I just find that I’m more accurate with numbers
> using my iPad mini as my writing is untidy and my numbers end up being wrong
> if I’m walking for a while! It might be worthwhile putting your
> comment/query on the Facebook version to see if any of the testers respond,
> or maybe Margaret or Richard Alcorn.
>
>
>
>
>> On 17 Jun 2015, at 3:50 pm, Carl Clifford <> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Sonja,
>>
>> They don't seem to be state lists, but if they are there are big holes in
>> them. Each location was slightly different. I would like them to be
>> accurate, as there were several species, such as Eastern Ground Parrot, that
>> I thought I would have to travel a couple of hundred Km or so to see.
>>
>> Meanwhile, I think I will stick to the good old Mk I notepad and pencil
>>
>> Carl
>
<HR>
<BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
<BR>
<BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
<BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
</HR>
|