birding-aus

Graylag Goose - status in Victoria amongst other "tickable ferals"

To: Philip Veerman <>, "" <>
Subject: Graylag Goose - status in Victoria amongst other "tickable ferals"
From: Paul Rose <>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:53:22 +1100
Hi Philip and others following this stream of conversation,
Strangely this species is posted on Eremaea Birds as Graylag, which is new to 
me as a Canadian and British citizen (now also Australian). So, going back to 
my first post re Graylag,it was merely an attempt to be culturally sensitive to 
the "local" spelling - happy to go back to Greylag.
I have since seen that Graylag does not appear on the IOC listing for Australia 
(as with BUBO listing) and does not appear on the C&B Checklist that was being 
circulated around birding-aus as a useful resource.  And yes, I will be 
steering clear of any emotionally vacuous attempts to include free-roaming 
domestics.  There are plenty of other wonderful Australian native species to 
spend time observing (and ticking).
Cheers,
Paul 


> From: 
> To: 
> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:50:44 +1100
> Subject: [Birding-Aus] Graylag Goose - status in Victoria amongst other       
> "tickable ferals"
> 
> As much as I like bird watching, I think this issue about "tickable" is
> amusing. The word itself implies (to me) that there is a yes or no answer,
> which surely has been shown not to be true. Many shades of grey. If talking
> about your own list, then why would anyone else care? If you wish to compare
> with others, then agree on your terms, which might differ from yet other
> people. Is there any consequence of breaking someone else's rules on this?
> Although it does seem to me to be a bit emotionally vacuous to include free
> roaming domestics and recent dependent ferals, in a count, as though the
> number of species seen matters. (especially as it is hard to draw a dividing
> line). 
> 
> What matters is what birds live where and how they do it. 
> 
> I do advocate that records should be kept, so that we can monitor progress
> of problems. That only impacts on personal tick lists if you want it to.
> Each survey has its own protocols.
> 
> Besides, I thought there is no Graylag Goose. I believe it is Greylag Goose.
> No one has made that correction, that I have noticed.
> 
> Philip
> 
> ===============================
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: 
> 
> http://birding-aus.org
> ===============================
                                          
===============================

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 

http://birding-aus.org
===============================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU