Dear All,
I agree that this is good news, and with others who have followed up
regarding the RSPCA's ill-judged contribution.
But I want to pick up on a comment from Mr Burke that I think gets to
the heart of why so few of the general public or politicians "get"
conservation (and so relates to my "bad news" lament from yesterday).
He is quoted in Rob's email as saying
"National parks are put there as a reserve for families to be able to
go and enjoy nature - that's what they're for".... "They're there for
the purpose of having some parts of our country reserved for people to
enjoy nature".
Notice his emphasis on Nat Parks as being *for people* and about
*people's enjoyment* of nature. There is nothing here that recognises a
conservation value of national parks, protecting habitats and
biodiversity because they have intrinsic value, and we have a
responsibility to be good custodians of that biodiversity. A
consequence of Mr Burke's interpretation is that National Parks are just
"resource" that is "consumed by the public". Under this interpretation
if the greater benefit *to people* would come from logging them, grazing
them, mining in them or otherwise exploiting them, then it is entirely
logical to do so. The fact that a statement like this is coming from
the Federal Minister for the Environment is exasperating.
Cheers, Ian
On 16/05/2013 1:04 PM, robert morris wrote:
The Federal Government has over-ruled the Qld Government to prevent grazing in
National Parks. One small win? Now I have sympathy for the drought stricken
farmers, but grazing the national parks is just not right!
Burke rejects allowing national parks cattle grazing
The Queensland Government has accused the Federal Government of stirring up the
biggest animals rights issue in Australia by rejecting its proposal to allow
starving cattle to graze on conservation reserves and national parks.
With a third of Queensland now drought-affected, Queensland National Parks
Minister Steve Dickson says he will keep lobbying federal Environment Minister
Tony Burke to change his mind.
"What we're here today to do is get starving cattle to eat food rather than dropping
dead in paddocks - they're the options we have - let them die in the paddock or do
something about it," he said.
"I'm sure Mr Burke will see the common sense in that."
Mr Dickson says the Federal Government risks an animals rights disaster, with
25,000 animals that may die from starvation.
"I don't know why anybody would want to get in the way of stopping cattle staying
alive," he said.
"You look at what happened in Indonesia not so long ago - I think everyone
jumped in the air because there was awful things happening over there with the
abattoirs.
"That's been resolved - let this not be another crisis, let's do the right thing,
let's pull together and save these cattle's lives."
'Absurb'
But Mr Burke says he will not be swayed.
"There's $60 million on the table right now for Queensland farmers for interest-free
loans that [Premier] Campbell Newman's refusing to sign up to," he said.
"It is just absurd for them to say that this is the only option, when everyone
else in Australia is able to find options that don't involve wrecking national parks.
"National parks are put there as a reserve for families to be able to go and
enjoy nature - that's what they're for.
"They're not farms, they're not rifle ranges, they're not there for the
purposed of massive land clearing.
"They're there for the purpose of having some parts of our country reserved for
people to enjoy nature."
But RSPCA spokesman Mark Townend says thousands of cattle could starve.
"Drought assistance may help but in this situation you can't get to those
cattle," he said.
"The only way is to move them down to those national parks."
'Outrageous' opposition
Deputy Premier Jeff Seeney says the Queensland Government will proceed with its plan,
saying the opposition to the proposal is "outrageous".
He says the Federal Government did provide funding to help purchase some of the
properties, so it is appropriate to seek their cooperation.
"We believe this is just such a common sense response to a critical animal welfare
situation that we will proceed in Parliament next week to amend the legislation," he
said.
"We don't need anyone's permission to change the state legislation.
"It is only the issue of the funding that was made available to buy these properties
- we are not going to be put off."
Rob Morris
Brisbane, Australia
===============================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
http://birding-aus.org
===============================
--
Prof. Ian Reid
School of Computer Science
University of Adelaide
Adelaide, 5005
ph: +61 (08) 83132135
www: http://cs.adelaide.edu.au
===============================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
http://birding-aus.org
===============================
|
