One problem, Bob. To which language would the term " common names" refer? To
make it absolutely clear, one would have to use the term "English common
names".
Carl Clifford
On 14/04/2013, at 11:57, "Robert Inglis" <> wrote:
> In the name of pedanticism............
>
> There must be a better label than “English names”. Personally, I prefer
> “common names”.
>
> Or should we only capitalise/capitalize the English versions of bird common
> names?
>
> It would seem that some non-English speaking (as a ‘first’ language)
> birdwatchers also capitalise bird common names. For example my copy of
> “Robert’s Birds of Southern Africa” lists common names in a number of
> languages and they all capitalise the names. That is, to maintain the
> pedantic theme, except for the Zulu names which all start with one, two or
> three lowercase letters immediately followed by what looks like the actual
> name headed by an uppercase letter. I don’t speak or understand “Zulu” (I
> barely understand English these days and that is certainly often the case
> when it is written) so I can’t comment on that form of spelling and format.
> Of course, that version of that field guide was published in 1984, before
> “texting” and “SMS” so it also has punctuation and the text uses complete
> words.
>
> Do, for example, German, Japanese, Spanish (but to name a few) birdwatchers
> refer to “English names in their everyday birding conversations?
>
> Just to make it clear, I always capitalise (but rarely capitalize) bird
> Common Names.
>
> Bob Inglis
> Sandstone Point
> Qld
> Australia
> ===============================
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to:
>
> http://birding-aus.org
> ===============================
===============================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
http://birding-aus.org
===============================
|
