birding-aus
|
To: | "" <>, "" <> |
---|---|
Subject: | Another bivalve victim |
From: | Peter Shute <> |
Date: | Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:52:29 +1100 |
I don't think anyone has ever claimed that banding will itself halt any declines. I was under the impression it was about proving that there is a decline and where the birds routes and feeding grounds are. Could anyone ever claim that a particular wetland deserves protection if they had no idea what effect its availability has on any species? Perhaps things would be far worse than they are without the data we have. Peter Shute -------------------------- Sent using BlackBerry |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Short Pied Oystercatcher, martin cachard |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Short Pied Oystercatcher - Another bivalve victim, Robert Inglis |
Previous by Thread: | Another bivalve victim, Gary Wright |
Next by Thread: | Another bivalve victim, Steven Creber |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU