Jeff. That's exactly right. If the bird is indeed nocturnal, nomadic, and
cryptic in its habits, chance encounters would be very unlikely to eventuate
unless there are a lot more of them than is commonly supposed. But it is
difficult to imagine what sort of knowledge would enable us to "guarantee
their survival". The sort of things we can imagine might have an impact on
their survival, e.g., feral animals, climate change, habitat loss etc.', are
difficult enough to control in a localised area, but nomadic desert birds
likely range over thousands of kilometres, and the reality is that very
little could be done to enhance the survival prospects of a nomadic desert
species. It is highly unlikely that enough could be learnt about its
movements to do anything at all. Consider the Princess Parrot or the Scarlet
Chested Parrot. These (presumably) are much easier to study than Night
Parrots, but apparently we do not know enough about their movements to be
able to predict where they are going to turn up at any given time. So if one
of those species were to become critically endangered what could we do about
it? Very little, I would suggest. Obviously, we hope that these species are
able to make good use of reserves like Gluepot and Newhaven, but there would
be little point in gazetting a National Park because a rare nomadic bird has
turned up there. It might never reappear there.
So, what is my point? That letting birders in on the secret is unlikely to
have any significant detriment to the species, but may in fact help. To
people who have been lucky enough to spot a Night Parrot: Should you be
surprised if you return the next day and can't find it? Most birds can cover
vast distances in a relatively short time and some birds do it for a living.
People who keep sightings secret, I imagine have good motives, thinking,
possibly, that if a population could be located, there might be time to set
up some sort of scientific study. And that this study might not be possible
in the presence of hordes of rabid twitchers. But realistically, in the
vast Australian landscape you might need an all-hands-on deck approach to
actually find the birds first. This has been suggested by a few and I
agree.
Steve Murray
-----Original Message-----
From:
On Behalf Of Jeff Davies
Sent: Wednesday, 6 June 2012 2:12 PM
To: 'Carl Clifford'; 'robert morris'
Cc: ; 'andrew stafford'; 'birding aus'
Subject: Night Parrot again
G'day Carl,
I doubt very much that "their end is Nigh" when the population is large
enough to leave to dead ones on the side of the road across two decades and
more importantly for them to actually be found by accident, how many dead
ones didn't get found.
Looks more like a much reduced population of a naturally extremely furtive
species to me. What's the probability of finding a dead bird on the side of
the road in a remote location and what minimum population size would be
required to deliver that outcome twice over a two decade period in extremely
remote location with few people looking for dead birds on the side of the
road.
The bird is surviving out there, but it would be good to learn more about it
so we can guarantee it survives out there.
I rest my case.
Cheers Jeff.
-----Original Message-----
From:
On Behalf Of Carl Clifford
Sent: Wednesday, 6 June 2012 12:40 PM
To: robert morris
Cc: ; birding aus; andrew stafford
Subject: Night Parrot again
Rob,
Probably we won't find out much about Nigh Parrots, as anyone can tell,
their end is Nigh.
Cheers,
Carl Clifford
Sent from my iPad
On 06/06/2012, at 11:36, robert morris <> wrote:
>
> The only things I would point out are:
> 1) The Tasmanian Tiger is actually declared extinct. The Night Parrot
> is
almost certainly not extinct.2) We know quite a lot about Tasmanian Tigers.
We know very little about Nigh Parrots.
> It is an analogy which the general public will be able to understand
> (and
perhaps be misled by?).....
> Rob Morris
>
>
>
> Brisbane, Australia
>
>
>> From:
>> Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:41:08 +1000
>> To:
>> CC: ;
>> Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Night Parrot again
>>
>> Andrew, Richard and BAers,
>>
>> From my point of view it makes perfect sense for an article about
>> night
parrots to quote both the Tassie Tiger (the most well known "lost species")
and budgie (the closest similar well-known bird). Both pieces are for a
popular non- birding readership and address this perfectly.
>>
>> In this case I would suspect this is a case of "editorial convergent
evolution" as it makes complete sense and logic.
>>
>> I also don't think BA as a forum should be used for accusations of
plagiarism either.
>>
>> Cheers all,
>>
>> Ed
>>
>> Ed Williams
>> Kingsville, VIC
>>
>> On 06/06/2012, at 9:52 AM, "Andrew Stafford" <>
wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Richard,
>>>
>>> I find your email both funny and mildly offensive at once -
>>> specifically
your assertion that I've plagiarised John Huxley's Brisbane Times report
from 2007. Mildly offensive because I was under the strong impression at the
time that Huxley had, in fact, come dangerously close to plagiarising MY
original report on the 2006 Night Parrot specimen in the June 2007 issue of
Wingspan! (Which, due to the quarterly publication's long lead time, was
written probably in April-May of that year.) My opening paragraph for that
story reads:
>>>
>>> "On Saturday 17 September 2006, Robert "Shorty" Cupitt, the
ranger-on-duty of Diamantina National Park in south-west Queensland, was
grading an interior road of the reserve when the blade of his vehicle
exposed the yellow underbelly of a bird he didn't recognise."
>>>
>>> Compare that to Huxley's opening paragraph and judge for yourself:
>>>
>>> "THE park ranger Robert "Shorty" Cupitt was repairing a section of
>>> track
in a remote part of Diamantina National Park, Queensland, when the blade of
his grader exposed the headless corpse of a bird he could not immediately
identify. The yellow-bellied bird..."
>>>
>>> The issue back then was that neither Birds Australia nor the
>>> National
Night Parrot network were informed about the discovery of the 2006 bird by
the Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service - contrary to its own management
plans for the species. I'd suggest you read the rest of the original report
before you start throwing (misspelt) accusations of hypocrisy around...
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Austrlian birding friends. I am research more around the Night
>>> Parrot. And I find this on the www.
>>>
>>> http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/national/twitchers-cry-foul-in-
>>> case-of-the-deceased-parrot/2007/06/22/1182019367467.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It is funny no?
>>>
>>> Why ?
>>>
>>> Well the Age writer has copied same ideas - 'Tasmanian Tiger' and
'Budgie'
>>> from Brisbane Times. 'Dubbed the Tasmanian tiger of the skies, this
>>> small, drab, budgerigar-like bird has fascinated scientists' Naughty
>>> naughty! Ha ha ha
>>>
>>> And more even funny - Birds Australia keep this record secret to
>>> hide it from birdwatchers 'hunting the bird down.'
>>>
>>> But at 2007 they told us all when dead bird found in Queensland like
>>> chicken with no head:
>>>
>>> Mike Weston, research and conservation manager at Birds Australia,
>>> says the "incredible secrecy" prevented a concerted inquiry that
>>> might have yielded clues to the birds' habits.
>>> "The way it was handled was most disappointing."
>>>
>>> Ha ha ha - I translate from www it is called 'hypocpacy' No?
>>>
>>> If may be proper bird watcher go to look and see - may be now we now
>>> no more about the Night Parrot? NO? May be too many chickens run
>>> with no heads and hiding at their desk?
>>>
>>> Richard
>>>
>>>
>>> ===============================
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message:
>>> unsubscribe
>>> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
>>> to:
>>>
>>> http://birding-aus.org
>>> ===============================
>> ===============================
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message:
>> unsubscribe
>> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
>> to:
>>
>> http://birding-aus.org
>> ===============================
>
> ===============================
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to:
>
> http://birding-aus.org
> ===============================
===============================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
http://birding-aus.org
===============================
===============================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
http://birding-aus.org
===============================
===============================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
http://birding-aus.org
===============================
|
