Publishing convention re bird-names

To: Russ Lamb <>, Birding-Aus Aus <>, Carl Clifford <>
Subject: Publishing convention re bird-names
From: David James <>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
I think the issue is more historical than style manuals. Historically, species 
common names in English have not been considered to be proper nouns. This is 
evident in any dictionary, and dictionaries (originally) provided definitions 
based on the way words have been used throughout history. It is not a problem 
understanding a species concept. Everyone can tell the difference between a 
'dog' and a 'cat', including the scholars who prepared the dictionaries. It is 
a lack of respect for species as important  things or 'Proper nouns'.
Many people argue that species names are not proper nouns, and leave it there, 
as though that is a self-evident argument. 
A proper noun is a name that represents a unique entity. It seems to 
me entirely inconsistent that species names are not considered to be proper 
nouns by dictionaries and style manuals and so forth, but the following 
entities are:
geographical localities, planets, corporations, institutions, roads, buildings, 
bridges, people, languages, cultures, food dishes, days of the week, months, 
holidays, festivals, wars, weather-events (e.g. cyclones), musical bands, 
diseases, books, documents, paintings, sculptures, religions, product brands, 
TV shows, web-pages....... You don't have a pet Dog called spot, you have a pet 
dog called Spot.
Rather anthropomorphic, but not entirely. It reflects the historical thinking 
of a species that collectively doesn't give a Rat's for other species. Birders 
should know better.
BTW, the RAOU (now called 'birdlife australia'?)  published a set of rules and 
list of 'Recommended English Names' for Australian birds in the Emu vol. 77 
Supplement in 1977 that predates Parkes 1978 and sets the basis for the names 
in common use in Australia today.    


From: Russ Lamb <>
To: Birding-Aus Aus <>; Carl Clifford 
Cc: Sean Dooley <> 
Sent: Wednesday, 11 April 2012 9:21 AM
Subject: Publishing convention re bird-names

I believe Carl is correct in nominating style manuals as the source of the 
problem. There was a time when newspapers, publishing houses, government 
departments etc.each had their own "style guide" (note, "guide" not "manual") 
to assist internal authors with their publications. Increasingly however, 
guides have given way to manuals, and the dominant one is the Federal 
Government endorsed (propably too weak a description) publication "Style 
manual: for authors, editors, and publishers" 6th edition (2002), which appears 
to have influence in Australian publishing way beyond the Commonwealth 
Government's many agencies.This manual was (to quote from the Australian 
Government website) "revised for the Australian Government by a consortium of 
communication and publishing professionals" and "provides guidance and 
recommendations for anyone faced with the task of preparing material for 
publication in either print or electronic format".
A quick glance at the members of this consortium reveals that they indeed are 
involved in the publishing industry, but of more interest to me was that only 
one (of at least 10)  appeared to come from an academic linguistics background.
None of this answers the question posed by previous correspondents as to why 
previously capitalized bird species names are no longer capitalized, but the 
decision appears to be part of a broad momentum to make published works more 
accessible to all readers, regardless of intended audiences and 
well-established and logical linguistic conventions. It is, in effect, yet 
another example of "dumbing-down" and the oxymoronic statement of "one size 
fits all".
I would be interested to hear what Sean Dooley, as editor of the old Wingspan 
and new Australian Birdlife, thinks of the reach of style manuals, and what 
guides him in publishing the magazine. (Interestingly I note in the first 
edition of the magazine that the front cover uses non-capitalized "birdlife", 
but the editorial refers to the magazine as " Australian Birdlife")

Russ Lamb, Maleny,SEQ

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU