While we are on the subject of EPBC Act, this case is interesting...
Carl is right, there should be a careful plan involved in doing this. I am sure
there is...or I hope so. Given Lord Howe Island Wood hen is a Commonwealth
protected matter and an environmental assessment is required where the action
is "likely to result in a significant impact", Commonwealth approval should
apply.
Here are the thresholds, as defined in the Commonwealth's Policy Statement 1.1
about significance
(http://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/publications/nes-guidelines.html):
Likely = To be ‘likely’, it is not necessary for a significant impact to have a
greater than 50% chance of happening; it is sufficient if a significant impact on
the environment is a real or not remote chance or possibility. If there is
scientific uncertainty about the impacts of your action and potential impacts
are serious or irreversible, the precautionary principle is applicable.
Accordingly, a lack of scientific certainty about the potential impacts of an
action will not itself justify a decision that the action is not likely to have
a significant impact on the environment.
Significant impact = A ‘significant impact’ is an impact which is important,
notable, or of consequence, having regard to its context or intensity. Whether
or not an action is likely to have a significant impact depends upon the
sensitivity, value, and quality of the environment which is impacted, and upon
the intensity, duration, magnitude and geographic extent of the impacts. You
should consider all of these factors when determining whether an action is
likely to have a significant impact on matters of national environmental
significance.
Removal of an entire population of a globally threatened species would very
clearly be a controlled action yet I can seem to find nothing about it on the
referrals list page.
If this is true, this would represent one of the most clear and serious EPBC
Act oversights I have seen. In theory, the assessment and management plan for
this should have gone on public exhibition for 90 days giving groups like this,
Birds Australia and others, chance to make comments and recommendations. There
is often the misconception that because something is being done for
conservation, the risks don't imply a need to get statutory approval. Perhaps
this is what has happened in this case.
Perhaps someone from Birds Australia would care to comment on this?
Regards,
Simon.
> From:
> To: ;
> Subject: RE: [Birding-Aus] Lord Howe Island Rodent Control Draws Flack
> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:56:00 +1000
>
> Anyone interested in looking further at this issue can check out the EPBC
> page on the Rail and the recovery plan (below)
> http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/recovery/
> lord-howe-wood-hen/index.html
>
> http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/publicspecies.pl?taxon_id
> =59572
>
> Interestingly, apparently rodent predation is listed as a Key Threatening
> Process, although "Rats do not appear to be a serious problem for the
> Woodhen, although they adversely affect the Kentia Palm industry and a
> control program is currently underway. However there is potential for
> indirect impacts upon Woodhen the population via rat and mouse control
> programs."
>
> More information at the link.
>
> This plan is not yet on the EPBC page so I am not sure how developed it is.
>
> With regards to the EPBC page, it would be a huge improvement if one could
> sign up for daily updates to the page. This really would contribute to the
> transparency of the process. In the mean time I have been talking to my
> partner in bat advocacy who is much more technologically savvy than I am and
> he has set up a 'robot' to watch the EPBC page and report changes to several
> matters that we are following. Ideally one would be able to find a robot
> that would report on new matters that met specific keywords.
>
> cheers
> storm
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> Behalf Of Carl Clifford
> Sent: Sunday, 21 June 2009 12:56 PM
> To: Birding-Aus Aus
> Subject: [Birding-Aus] Lord Howe Island Rodent Control Draws Flack
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> The proposed rodent control program on Lord Howe Is. by broadcasting
> brodiafacoum baits by helicopter seems to be causing a bit of an
> upset. See http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/19/2603486.htm
> Apparently the Lord Howe Woodhen population is to be rounded up , and
> removed from the island as they are attracted to the proposed baits.
>
> An interesting exercise in theory, but potentially fraught with
> opportunities for Murphy to do his worst. I hope when they round up
> the Woodhens, they remove them in several shipments.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Carl Clifford
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to:
> ===============================
>
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to:
> ===============================
_________________________________________________________________
With Windows Live, you can organise, edit, and share your photos.
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/134665338/direct/01/ ===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
===============================
|
