birding-aus

News on http://www.worldbirdinfo.net

To: Birding-aus <>
Subject: News on http://www.worldbirdinfo.net
From: John Leonard <>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:59:43 +1000
Please, expecting website ratings to be above-board and realistic is
like expecting real estate agents to tell the truth about the
properties they're selling!

John Leonard

2009/4/6 Dave Torr <>:
> First let me declare an interest - I am acting webmaster at BOCA which
> usually rates slightly higher than John's site - and realistically given the
> number of members most Aussie bird clubs have then that is reasonable.
>
> Maybe "dubious" was the wrong word but I find that - despite what you say
> Trevor - none of the world's "major" birding organisations (Audubon, ABA,
> RSPB, even Birds Aus) are in the top 100 - probably because they choose not
> to have the counter installed. Whilst Avibase and Fatbirder come in at 13
> and 14 (and well deserved!) the first identifiable "bird club" is the Dutch
> Birding Association at 17. Number 23 in the current list does not even have
> a name! It seems that photo sites and blogs tend to dominate and as you say
> Trevor there are few "scientific" sites like John's in the list.
>
> Nothing wrong with any of this but John should realise - as we do - that
> this is a very distorted set of figures as it can only rate those who want
> to be rated and that it would seem that if you don't do photography you are
> doomed to sit way down the order. Of course if the big bird clubs ever did
> get on the list then we would probably sink even further down.
>
> 2009/4/5 Trevor Hampel <>
>
>>
>>
>> Dave Torr wrote:
>>
>>> There is a Birding Top 500 meter on the home page. I am very suspicious of
>>> these as the list of top sites in the world sometimes has very surprising
>>> entries!
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hi there Dave and other birders,
>>
>> What are you suspicious of?
>>
>> Listed are many fine and very popular sites, including blogs about birds
>> written by groups or - as is the case with my blog - written by individuals.
>> Many listed in the top 100 sites are from the world's leading birding and
>> ornithological organisations.
>>
>> Do you mean that the list includes some sites which sell optics and other
>> items relating to birds, things like t-shirts, bird houses, bird feed, for
>> example? The owner of the Birding Top 500 site has allowed these according
>> to his specific rules. I fail to see why you should be suspicious of these
>> sites - they openly advertise their wares for sale and are legitimate
>> businesses (as far as I know - but buyer beware!)
>>
>> The Birding Top 500 site lists sites purely on the number of visitors that
>> they attract. The more traffic they get, the higher the ranking. It is a
>> crude measure and only an indicator of popularity, little else.
>>
>> I include the meter on my blog merely as a simple indicator to my readers.
>> (I hope it also leads readers to other interesting sites via the link.) I
>> also monitor my statistics with a far more sophisticated site which gives a
>> complete breakdown of where my readers live, which entries are visited the
>> most, which search engines they use as well as number of unique visitors,
>> number of visitors, page views and many other items. This information can be
>> analysed on an hourly, daily or monthly basis.
>>
>> Because of this I only use the Birding Top 500 meter as an crude indicator
>> - nothing more. I'm currently listed at #55 and have been in the 50s for the
>> last few months. The highest I've been is about #30. Despite 600+ visitors
>> daily from 100+ countries, I will never go much higher because the top 50
>> sites are largely made up of large organisations with 1000s of contributors,
>> subscribers or members. One person cannot complete with that - nor do I wish
>> to.
>>
>> My aim is to share my bird sightings and photos - and if I enthuse a few
>> people to observe and care for our birds a little more, I will have achieved
>> my aims.
>>
>> I've included John's original email below to set the context of this
>> discussion. John's site is meticulously comprehensive in its contents but
>> will - in my opinion - never rank much higher than #200. It is just not the
>> kind of site that will be popular by any measure.
>>
>> Scientifically accurate - yes.
>> Comprehensive - yes.
>> Authoritative - yes.
>> Useful - yes - but only to a limited number of people unfortunately.
>>
>> I believe that John should not be concerned about the popularity of the
>> site and should be encouraged to continue his quest for a very comprehensive
>> resource.
>>
>>
>>  Dear Friends,
>>>>
>>>> I am disappointed that the rating for my website
>>>> http://www.worldbirdinfo.net <http://www.worldbirdinfo.net/>
>>>>
>>>> has fallen so low. Here are some reasons for raising its rating.  I have
>>>> been going systematically through the records, and improving notably
>>>> habitat, movements, pictures and calls.  I have completed all
>>>> Ostriches,Rheas,Cassowaries,Emus.Tinamous.Loons, Albatrosses,and I am
>>>> into
>>>> Petrels.  With very few exceptions I have added photos to all of these
>>>> (even
>>>> of Atitlan Grebe!), and calls for many, inlcuding several albatrosses and
>>>> petrels.
>>>>
>>>> Check it out! And keep checking it out! And tell your friends and
>>>> colleagues.
>>>>
>>>> John Penhallurick
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Trevor Hampel
>> Murray Bridge
>> South Australia
>>
>> Check out my BLOGS (web logs):
>>
>> Trevor's Birding - observations and photos of birds at
>> http://www.trevorsbirding.com
>>
>> Trevor's Travels - travels in Australia, Thailand and Nepal at
>> http://www.trevorstravels.com
>>
>> Trevor's Writing - read some of my writing at http://www.trevorhampel.com
>>
>> Twitter: follow me on Twitter - http://twitter.com/TrevorHampel
>>
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: 
> ===============================
>



--
John Leonard
Canberra
Australia
www.jleonard.net

"I rejoice that there are owls." Thoreau
==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
=============================
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU