birding-aus

Digital SLR for bird photography

To: Peter Shute <>,Birding Aus <>
Subject: Digital SLR for bird photography
From: julian <>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:05:27 +1100
Modern focusing screens in DSLRS are not actually designed to help the AF system since they are unrelated to how the AF works and are used only by the human user.

The normal DSLR is provided with a plain focus screen (without a split prism) because that is less distracting for general work and split prisms can affect light metering. But these plain screens are lousy for manual focus, especially with small aperture lenses (f4, f5.6) like those mostly used for birds.

Most up-market and many mid-market DSLRs allow you to replace the focus screen with OEM or after-market screens. Here's a link to the best-known manufacturer's replacement screen for my camera (Canon 30D). The only reason I haven't got one yet is because of the cost and that I can't work out from the installation instructions how tricky it is to install, or how much can go wrong, Also there is the issue of "funny" performance around the centre of the screen where the split image and microprisms are, but where many of my birds live their entire lives (i.e. within the small centre circle). I'd like to try before I buy. Other than those unknowns, I agree that manual focus with the standard screens is all but impossible for critical work, so split prism screens would be a great improvement. And help prevent those hundreds of photos I've taken with perfectly focused twigs and blurred bird.

http://www.katzeyeoptics.com/item--Katz-Eye-Focusing-Screen-for-the-Canon-30D--prod_30D.html

On this site can also be found lots of other good info on this topic.

Cheers
Julian

At 11:49 AM 12/12/2008, you wrote:
> In the old days of film and manual focus only cameras
> focussing screens were fantastic and had split prisms etc to
> ensure you were getting what you wanted in focus. Since the
> advent of auto focus teh focussing screens are designed to
> help the AF system not the user.
> This i think is the single biggest reason why manually
> focussing modern cameras is quite difficult.

I didn't know that. I assume the optical screens on DSLRs are much better that the approx 100k pixel electronic viewfinder on my Canon S3, but perhaps not so much better as I thought. Are there particular brands and models that have better focusing screens than the rest?

Given the number of occasions that the bird is behind twigs or leaves, I would have thought that the quality of manual focusing was essential, yet it doesn't seem to be discussed that often.

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU