birding-aus
|
To: | |
---|---|
Subject: | Effects of call playback on birds |
From: | "Douglas Carver" <> |
Date: | Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:51:07 -0600 |
I have taken courses with two different ornithologists at the Smithsonian Institution. Both cautioned against using playbacks, except in rare instances, and even then using them sparingly (one had a rule of thumb that if the bird did not appear after the second playing of the call or song, he would not try a third time). While neither had hard empirical data (or at least, no data they shared with the class), they both said that a bird responding to a call is expending energy needlessly, which puts unnecessary stress on the bird. The bird's well-being is more important than our twitch.
Cheers, Douglas Carver Albuquerque, NM USA On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Andrew Taylor <> wrote: There are many publications involving playback but almost all are using -- Dilexi iustitiam et odivi iniquitatem, propterea morior in exilio. (I have loved justice and hated iniquity, therefore I die in exile.) -- the last words of Saint Pope Gregory VII (d. 1085) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Effects of call playback on birds, Andrew Taylor |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Effects of call playback on birds, Syd Curtis |
Previous by Thread: | Effects of call playback on birds, Andrew Taylor |
Next by Thread: | Effects of call playback on birds, Richard Hoyer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU