I think that would be acting immorally, but maybe not illegally. Of
course morals are highly subjective.
My point before was that they were foolish because they invested money
before the final decision had been made.
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: peter crow
Sent: Monday, 4 August 2008 3:15 PM
To: Dave Torr
Cc: Bill Stent; birding australia
Subject: Savannah cat story
Bill,
They did act foolishly. they made a decision without considering the
potential damage to native wildlefe. In my opinion that's foolish.
Peter
On 04/08/2008, at 2:32 PM, Dave Torr wrote:
> But the article makes it plain that they had permission "The Parkers
> had planned to import 14 Savannah Cats in November after gaining
> written approval from the Federal Government and Australian Customs.".
> So seems they did not act foolishly and as the government has changed
> its mind (and for once in the correct way!) the Parkers have I would
> have thought some grounds for feeling hard done by!
>
> 2008/8/4 Bill Stent <>
>
==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
=============================
|
