birding-aus
|
To: | "'George Oakes'" <>, "'Birding-Aus'" <> |
---|---|
Subject: | RFI re 8x42 v 10x 42 |
From: | "Tony Russell" <> |
Date: | Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:17:50 +0930 |
Crikey, if your hands shook like mine do you wouldn't go above 5 times. Tripods are great. -----Original Message----- From: On Behalf Of George Oakes Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 4:36 PM To: Birding-Aus Subject: RFI re 8x42 v 10x 42 When I purchased new binoculars recently to compare 8 times and 10 times it was suggested to me that if a bird is 50m away an 8 times will bring it up to the equivalent of a little over 6m away while a 10 times will bring it up to an equivalent of 5m away. If you compare these distances of 5m. and 6m.plus there is not much difference in looking at a bird.After taking into account such things as shake, field of vision, and weight I finished up buying an 8.5 x 42 binoculars. George Oakes Woodford in the beautful Blue Mountains. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Top Gear, birds and bears, Tony Russell |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Top Gear, birds and bears, Paul Taylor |
Previous by Thread: | RFI re 8x42 v 10x 42, George Oakes |
Next by Thread: | RFI re 8x42 v 10x 42, Peter Shute |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU