birding-aus

Museum specimen colour deterioration

To: <>
Subject: Museum specimen colour deterioration
From: "Peter Shute (NUW)" <>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:22:33 +1100
On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 2:16 PM Geoffrey Dabb wrote:

Bird observers
may be divided into those who can see purple in P. p.
melanotus, and those who see only blue.  Some writers do just say
'blue'.
Leading exponent for the purple faction is the Simpson & Day guide,
which
not only declares for the purple but shows an unlikely violet in its
illustration.  ('Purple' is usually a synonym for 'violet' or a more
plummy
colour on the red side of violet.)

I just read this again and looked up some photos. http://www.birdsinbackyards.net/finder/display.cfm?id=87 and http://www.treknature.com/gallery/Oceania/New_Zealand/photo78834.htm both show it as having a different colour on the front the back, whatever you call it. So Simpson and Day might have the wrong colour, but the contrast in the two colours isn't exaggerated. The museum specimen looked pretty much the same all over to me.

Peter Shute
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU