I have been on this mailing list for a number of years now and only use this
email address for birding-aus and talking to a few friends. I have rarely, if
ever received a spam email to this account and take no special prevention
measures on this account. Other equivalent accounts which I subscribe to other
things are not nearly so fortunate... so i really dont think birding-aus
archives are a source of spam at this moment in time...
To bring this back on topic... Lysterfield Lake Park, SE of Melbourne is well
worth a visit at the moment. Tramped around there in very soggy conditions on
Saturday and saw around 50 species without trying too hard. Golden and Rufous
Whistlers are everywhere and in full voice... which makes it a plesant walk. On
the lake itself saw 3 Blue-billed ducks with very bright bills, a single male
musk duck motoring along and around a dozen great crested grebes. Other
highlights amongst bush birds were a number of Orioles heard and one seen,
Sacred Kingfisher, Fan-tailed cuckoos and a number of species feeding young,
including Spinebills, W-T treecreepers and various other honeyeaters.
Cheers
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Taylor <>
To: birding aus <>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:49:59 +1100
Subject: Un-named Observers
I'll try to implement whatever protection Russell chooses for the archive.
My personal view is that the archive should remain public. I believe
there is very little bird-related content that is appropriate to send
by e-mail to birding-aus subscribers but not make publically available
in the archives on the web. And I think a publically available archive
is useful, e.g. for birders visiting from overseas, for people working
on conservation and for researchers.
I'm happy to delete from the archive any message at the request of the
sender and several people have done this after inadvertently including
personal details. I'm also happy to delete a message for someone who
believes it defames them and there have been some unfortunate incidents in
the past. I would, of course, delete a message if I'm told its likely to
bring harm to birds. I haven't been asked to do this which I guess means
for the most part people refrained from e-mailing such information
to birding-aus.
The archive shouldn't be a source of spam. E-mail addresses in the
birding-aus archive are slightly camouflaged. Stronger counter-measures
could be used but I haven't received any spam to a test address inserted
in the archive so it seems sufficient. Your e-mail address might have
been harvested from the archive before I implemented this early this
year - sorry.
But I'm happy for Russell to decide what is the best form for the archive.
Andrew Taylor
--------------------------------------------
Birding-Aus is now on the Web at
www.birding-aus.org
--------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message 'unsubscribe
birding-aus' (no quotes, no Subject line)
to
--------------------------------------------
Birding-Aus is now on the Web at
www.birding-aus.org
--------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message 'unsubscribe
birding-aus' (no quotes, no Subject line)
to
|
