|Subject:||Re: Children's book & Editors|
|From:||Syd Curtis <>|
|Date:||Wed, 09 Jun 2004 10:08:01 +1000|
Further to the exchange below, in unhappy moods I sometimes think that editors, like real estate agents, are but a necessary evil. In an article I once wrote for a well-known Australian magazine, I referred to Albert's Lyrebirds' using their mimicry in fixed order to form a song some 40 to 50 seconds long, which may be cycled over and over. The editor had to gild the lily by adding "like a cracked record". A record that revolved once every 40 seconds?
It is so unlike the repetition of a cracked record, that for over 100 years after the species was described, the repetition remained unnoticed.
But let's be reasonable: editors (and referees of papers and theses) are not doing their job properly unless they require a change of something an author has written, just on principle. Are they? :-)
Lucky your friend is not writing a Christmas book. The editor might point out that it is quite impossible for one man to visit every child in the world in 24 hours. And flying reindeer? Don't get me started.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Nightcap N P - N. NSW; lyrebird distribution, Syd Curtis|
|Next by Date:||Cranes, Bustards and other winter visitors, Atherton Tablelands, Alan Gillanders|
|Previous by Thread:||Children's book, Michael Whitehead|
|Next by Thread:||Children's book, Carol Probets|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: firstname.lastname@example.org.EDU.AU