birding-aus
|
To: | "Birding-aus (E-mail)" <> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Little Terns |
From: | David Geering <> |
Date: | Mon, 7 Feb 2000 16:34:00 +1100 |
Ian Temby's suggestion of baiting raven and gulls is potentially a good one but would treatment that resulted in birds suffering "post-ingestional distress" require a permit under various wildlife acts or animal ethics approval? The principle sounds great but perhaps the legality needs investigating. David Geering To unsubscribe from this list, please send a message to Include ONLY "unsubscribe birding-aus" in the message body (without the quotes) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Unnatural Heritage, norris |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: Little Terns, Ian . Temby |
Previous by Thread: | Little Terns, Ian . Temby |
Next by Thread: | RE: Little Terns, Keith Egan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU