birding-aus

Re: birding-aus Ticking rules

To:
Subject: Re: birding-aus Ticking rules
From: Laurence and Leanne Knight <>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 17:52:23 +1000
 wrote:
> 
> I was going to try to let this subject die, but Steve Clark gave the best
> contribution yet, so here goes ...
> 
> I basically follow the rules on Tony Palliser's home page :
> 
> 1. All species counted should be seen alive and in the wild.
> 2. Geography shall be defined as Mainland Australia, its Territories or
> anywhere within the 200 NM limit.
> 3. Taxonomy should follow the new RAOU checklist .
> 4. Submissions should be honest, accurate and dated.
> 

Hmmm, I suspect Tony mustn't be too popular with Taswegians - they
aren't mainlanders, but I suspect they wouldn't view their island state
as being an Australian territory ...

Regards, LK
To unsubscribe from this list, please send a message to

Include ONLY "unsubscribe birding-aus" in the message body (without the
quotes)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU