Re: birding-aus Having a little rave.

To: "Tony Russell" <>, "birding Aus" <>
Subject: Re: birding-aus Having a little rave.
From: Goodfellow <>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 99 17:25:51 +0930
To Tony and others>
Jurgen Habermas said as much in the 1970's in a paper called the 
Legitimation Crisis.  People are 'encouraged' to look to their careers or 
lifestyle rather than involve themselves in government or the questioning 
of government.  But in the case of some the main concern is holding heart 
and soul together.  As a member of a semi-traditional Aboriginal clan I 
see this all the time.  Consequently all such people do is vote.  

However the power of the vote to change much at all is eroding fast as 
government puts all it can into administration, or divests functions to 
business and puts them on a 'user pays' footing.  Much including 
essential services ends up in the hands of national and transnational 
businesses.  ( I don't read the New Internationalist but I own a 
secondhand bookshop and read everything I can on the subject, and I have 
post grad. qualifications in sociology). 

People who feel they have much to lose - job, reputation, house, family 
can be compromised and government and business know this well.   For 
example a senior public servant and family man discovered that a fault in 
the design of powerlines was responsible for bush fires which were 
putting people's lives and property at risk.  But his superiors would 
know the information came from him, he would lose his job and so despite 
his obvious anguish he refused to become a whistleblower, quit and left 
the Territory.

An alderman on Darwin City Council back in the 80's I was outspoken on 
Aboriginal issues at a time when many didn't seem to recognise that 
Aboriginal people were even human.  Like other politicians and public 
servants who buck the system (systems cannot cope with diversity.  It 
causes uncertainty)  I was squeezed; papers I wrote for consultants never 
reached them; staff wouldn't cooperate; I couldn't bring about 
improvements in my ward.  After, despite my qualifications I found it 
impossible to get government work.  

On the issue of the environment local scientists  refused to get involved 
in certain issues eg the Stuart Park mangroves and the Chestnut Rail, 
having been warned their jobs would be jeopardised.  Not ever having been 
employed by Government they couldn't do much to me except to refuse to 
sell my wildlife books!  I did receive the odd death threat and hate mail 
(and still do).  

But worse has happened.  Paige Mulhollan, historian under Lyndon Johnson 
in the White House and Professor of History and Political Science, Uni. 
of South Carolina  and personal friend told me recently  that accusations 
of child abuse were sometimes made to silence the outspoken.  But it 
doesn't only happen in the US.  There is evidence that it is happening in 
Australia too.

On the question of my poor Aboriginal relatives who have been mistreated 
by the authorities, I've  discovered some powerful allies among the 
Anglican Church and there's an idea for the environment.  The Church or 
some arms of it (I'm not too clear on this not being a believer) is 
apparently beginning  to come around to the idea that God is the 
environment.  However there is another solution. 

The anthropologist Colin Turnbull once wrote, "For the hunter in his tiny 
close-knit society, kindness, generosity, consideration, affection, 
honesty, etc, are not virtues.  They are necessities for survival. " (The 
Mountain People). 

Such values are necessary for human survival, in every human relationship 
and community whether hunter-gatherer or post-industrial.  And here is 
the key for people who feel threatened.  Use your altruistic feelings by 
getting involved in issues that don't touch your job, or issues that 
occur in other states or countries.  For instance while local scientists 
wouldn't back me over the mangroves, birdwatchers and scientists in other 
parts of Australia and the world did.  Dozens of them sent informed, 
caring, impassioned letters espousing the importance of mangroves and the 
Chestnut Rail to the NT Government.  (This issue may erupt again.  Watch 
this page.)  

Put arguments in economic and non-emotive terms.  One of my most 
successful campaigns was on housing.  Chief Minister Paul Everingham told 
me the media was to blame for would-be workers (and sometimes their 
families) thinking Darwin was a 'boom' town.  Hundreds if not thousands 
travelled all the way here and finding few jobs.  Many, unable to find or 
afford housing had to camp on the beach.  As secretary of NT Shelter I 
wrote to dozens of magazines and newspapers setting out facts and figures 
and reiterating the Chief Minister's words, that the media was to blame.  
So I continued, tell your readers not to come to Darwin.  That letter had 
quite an impact. 

A simillar tactic can be used for the environment  eg, tourism is a major 
growth industry in Australia, and birdwatchers are a large component (by 
far the largest component of natural history tourism).  Destroy bird 
habitat and birders won't come costing the town, state, territory so many 
millions of dollars in lost income.   

Think and act in terms of what is possible for you even if the issue is 
impossibly large.  Others may be inspired.  

Find like-minded people.   I think I've just found a few more.
Denise Goodfellow

To unsubscribe from this list, please send a message to

Include ONLY "unsubscribe birding-aus" in the message body (without the

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU