David James <>,
Re: River red gums
"Brandis, Chris CC" <>
Tue, 7 Apr 1998 07:33:00 +1000
And while noisy news making green groups worry about a 50 acre mine site
that will be rehabilitated, 10,000 acres of land is cleared with no
rehabilitation even considered is scary.
From: David James
Subject: Re: River red gums
Date: Monday, 6 April 1998 3:55PM
At 07:16 2/04/98 +1000, you wrote:
> the NSW Minister for Land and Water Conservation has lifted all
> remaining controls on clearing of river red gums on freehold lands.
> open slather.
> I am not even sure how much land this affects or if this ruling also
>impacts on leasehold lands.
Yet another disaster. The tree-clearing guidelines in QLD are the worst
ecological disaster in the state at present and generally recognised by
States' conservation movement as the biggest (and toughest) issue on a
jam-packed card. In Qld, not only are the guidelines poor &^
disgusting) for leasehold, but they do not apply at all to freehold. The
scary thing is that the Qld cabinet appears to be developing legislation
for fast-tracking the process of conversion leasehold to freehold (using
the Wik debate as a sheild). I hope this is not happening in NSW, or we
kiss biodiversity good bye.
PO BOX 5225
Townsville Mail Centre 4810
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering
takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely
a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way.
If you wish to get material removed from the archive or
have other queries about the archive e-mail
Andrew Taylor at this address: