birding-aus

Re: PSC/BSC

To: (John Leonard)
Subject: Re: PSC/BSC
From:
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 11:02:35 +1000
     Conversely we could argue now that because of the doubt, each 
     populatiion may be a new species and thus they shouldn't bulldoze any 
     of it?
     
     Dream on.......


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: PSC/BSC
Author:   (John Leonard) at pau-smtp
Date:    14/1/98 9:38


The problem with this controversy (if it is one yet) is that the powers of 
darkness will use the apparent disagreement in the taxanomic community as an 
excuse to belittle the importance of conservation considerations in specific 
instances. For example:
     
"Since there is no agreement as to whether the population of the rare 
bird/frog/fish/plant in this patch of rainforest is a species, sub-species 
or even just a population, then it doesn't matter that we intend to bulldoze 
the place for a new restort complex".
     
     
     
     
#############################################
     
John Leonard (Dr),
PO Box 243,
Woden, ACT 2606
     
'I thought of New York as a Hemlock forest that had 
been logged too heavily....'
                                        Murray Gell-Mann
     

http://www.spirit.net.au/~jleonard
#############################################
     

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU