birding-aus
|
To: | |
---|---|
Subject: | Cuckoo years: good and bad |
From: | Michael <> |
Date: | Wed, 03 Sep 1997 13:51:56 +1000 |
Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoos arrived here in SE Melbourne in the last week of August and seem to be staying. They were "everywhere" in 1994 but in 1995 I collated only 3 records and in 1996 a mere one, and that an immature in February). Why are there good and bad cuckoo years when our population of small birds (potential nest hosts) does not seem to vary much ? You would think one bad year would mean fewer cuckoos next year and a continuing decline. Are the good and bad years localised ? Ie. do the cuckoos do well one year in one place and then (like a farmer rotating crops) deliberately go elsewhere the next ? The answer is probably RTFM, as they say on Usenet, but I'd be interested in references. Thanks. Mike. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Substitutes for exotic plants, Michael |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: Cuckoo years: good and bad, Conole, Lawrie |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Substitutes for exotic plants, Michael Hines |
Next by Thread: | Re: Cuckoo years: good and bad, Michael John Ramsey |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU