GEO: Wanderers or Royals?

birding-aus

GEO: Wanderers or Royals?

Subject:	GEO: Wanderers or Royals?
From:	<>
Date:	Tue, 27 Jun 1995 00:04:57 +1000

I was just looking at the article on Wandering Albatross in the
May/June 1995 issue of GEO, and noticed that some of the photos appear
to be of Royal Albatross, not Wanderers.  The most obvious of these
pictures is on page 48, above the heading "Declining Numbers".
The black cutting edge to the bill is quite noticable.  Some of the other
photos also appear to show this feature, but not as clearly.

Is this indeed the case?

Paul Taylor
==========================================

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
GEO: Wanderers or Royals?, pmtaylor <= GEO: Wanderers or Royals?, TPALLISE.AU.ORACLE.COM

Previous by Date:	Re: Gould's Petrel sightings, Nicholas Carlile
Next by Date:	Great Winged Petrels, identon
Previous by Thread:	Re: Gould's Petrel sightings, Nicholas Carlile
Next by Thread:	GEO: Wanderers or Royals?, TPALLISE.AU.ORACLE.COM
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU