ts-7000
[Top] [All Lists]

[ts-7000] Re: differences between gcc compilers/linkers

To:
Subject: [ts-7000] Re: differences between gcc compilers/linkers
From: "Kris" <>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:17:38 -0000
You are correct that if you link statically it will work, but as far as dynamic 
linking goes you will want to match the ABI to the libraries that the system is 
using.

For many of our products we offer a Debian Lenny armel distribution that uses 
EABI binary formats, but for legacy reasons we will not make these default 
shipping.  You can find tarballs on our FTP site:  ftp://ftp.embeddedarm.com

We are planning on releasing new products that will ship default using EABI 
based distributions.  The entire TS-SOCKET Macrocontroller series will come out 
with EABI support.

-Kris Bahnsen
Technologic Systems


--- In  Wouter Simons <> wrote:
>
> I don't fully agree, personally I use statically linked EABI code with a 
> newer GCC version and find that (in spite of slightly larger code size) the 
> performance is better (when I am forced to use floats).
> 
> Also, there are two distributions that are fully EABI, but both are testing 
> according to the manuals. Is there any plan to make a released version with 
> EABI userspace?
> 
> All the best,
> 
> Wouter
> 
> Van:   Namens Kris
> Verzonden: dinsdag 7 december 2010 18:11
> Aan: 
> Onderwerp: [ts-7000] Re: differences between gcc compilers/linkers
> 
> 
> 
> Correct, one is EABI and the other is OABI. For nearly all of the current 
> TS-7XXX SBCs our stock image has the kernel compiled against the EABI 
> compiler with the userspace libraries and binaries compiled against OABI.
> 
> Both the TS-7800 and TS-7200 will want to use the OABI verion 
> (arm-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc.exe) for userspace applications.
> 
> -Kris Bahnsen
> Technologic Systems
> 
> --- In <ts-7000%40yahoogroups.com>, "Donal 
> O'Connor" <donaloconnor@> wrote:
> >
> > One might be eabi and other abi?
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:20 PM, tommessum <tommessum@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > What is the difference between
> > >
> > > arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc.exe
> > > and
> > > arm-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc.exe
> > >
> > > I am using a TS7800 board with Eclipse and Debian linux, and can generate
> > > both static and dynamic link binaries with one of the above compilers but
> > > not with the other (it won't run). Why not?
> > >
> > > Am I right in saying that a dynamic link binary generated with (one of the
> > > above) can be used in a TS-7200 board as is (which one?)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
     
    

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

Disclaimer: Neither Andrew Taylor nor the University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering take any responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU