RE: [ts-7000] Re: differences between gcc compilers/linkers

[Wouter Simons <>]

I don’t fully agree, personally I use statically linked EABI code with a newer GCC version and find that (in spite of slightly larger code size) the performance is better (when I am forced to use floats).

 

Also, there are two distributions that are fully EABI, but both are testing according to the manuals. Is there any plan to make a released version with EABI userspace?

 

All the best,

 

Wouter

 

Van: [ Namens Kris
Verzonden: dinsdag 7 december 2010 18:11
Aan:
Onderwerp: [ts-7000] Re: differences between gcc compilers/linkers

 

 

Correct, one is EABI and the other is OABI. For nearly all of the current TS-7XXX SBCs our stock image has the kernel compiled against the EABI compiler with the userspace libraries and binaries compiled against OABI.

Both the TS-7800 and TS-7200 will want to use the OABI verion (arm-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc.exe) for userspace applications.

-Kris Bahnsen
Technologic Systems

--- In ts-7000%40yahoogroups.com, "Donal O'Connor" <> wrote:
>
> One might be eabi and other abi?
>
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:20 PM, tommessum <> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > What is the difference between
> >
> > arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc.exe
> > and
> > arm-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc.exe
> >
> > I am using a TS7800 board with Eclipse and Debian linux, and can generate
> > both static and dynamic link binaries with one of the above compilers but
> > not with the other (it won't run). Why not?
> >
> > Am I right in saying that a dynamic link binary generated with (one of the
> > above) can be used in a TS-7200 board as is (which one?)
> >
> >
> >
>

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: =Email Delivery: Digest | m("yahoogroups.com?subject","ts-7000-fullfeatured");=Change Delivery Format: Fully Featured">Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | =Unsubscribe

__,_._,___