ts-7000
[Top] [All Lists]

[ts-7000] Re: BusyBorks

To:
Subject: [ts-7000] Re: BusyBorks
From: "j.chitte" <>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:33:01 -0000
--- In  Jim Jackson <> wrote:
>
> 
> > I'd noticed it was pretty sloppy but I did not want to start 
bashing
> > their scripts as well (he-he) and diverting the issue.
> 
> I wasn't "bash"ing their scripts - honest :-)

No, I meant I was tempted to. ;)

> 
> > The closer I look the less impressed I am. They give the 
impression
> > they supply a working minimallist linux but I'm getting closer to 
the
> > point where I'm going to have to rebuild most of it before it can 
can
> > be deployed.
> 
> I can't agree. I view it as I'm buying a well engineered, cheap, 
board, 
> along with a base system (actually 2 base systems) that is/are a 
starting 
> point for developments. 
I agree the boards are good value but they dont present TSlinux as "a 
starting point". I feel there is a lack of clarity there.

> If they spent more on s/w developement and that 
> pushed up the price, I wouldn't be happy. So far I've not met any 
serious 
> s/w gotchas that couldn't be fixed - the virtue of the open source 
world.
> 
> > Neither do they seem to bothered about correcting this sort of 
thing.
> 
> I don't think it ranks as a serious problem - the busybox problem 
is a 
> busybox problem not a TS problem, and frankly scripts are trivially 
> re-engineered. They have to concentrate on the s/w bits strictly in 
their 
> domain.

Well once I realise that some system scripts are duff and things as 
basic a awk are severly broken I have to start test _everything_.


> 
> Believe me there are other suppliers with a lot more expensive 
products and 
> absolutely NO s/w support without a contract!
> 
> Jim
>

Well I dont doubt that you are right. But there's a difference 
between software support and a defective product.

It should work. If I need support in modifying that's a different 
issue. Luckily there is this group that does the support for their 
defective distro.

If I had realised the ammount of extra work required, I probably 
would not have got into TS boards.  

Having said that the h'w seem solid and well designed. It's a shame 
they don't clean up the loose ends on the s'w and save everyone 
having to reinvent that particular wheel.

Thanks for you thought, and help.

/js



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
     
    

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

Disclaimer: Neither Andrew Taylor nor the University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering take any responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU